User talk:Simisa

Invitation to Cuba

Hello, my name is Yoel Diaz, I'm from Cuba, I'm a graphic designer and audiovisual producer, I love the world of pictures, in fact I love your photos and how you shot, I use two monitors on my PC to work and i widespread your panoramics on my monitors and I think I'm seeing the world through a window, great pictures, thanks. When you want to go through Cuba, please contact me, gladly I will serve to guide and help to make your photos of Cuba and i pretty sure that with your hands & cam it will be the most beautiful pics ever taken of my country.

find me on Facebook or write me to: yoeztudioz@gmail.com

great pleasure, take care

Hi Yoel,

Thank you very much for your kind words. I am happy to hear that you like my panos and you describe precisely what they are made for: To see our fantastic world with different eyes. Unfortunately Cuba is not in the scope of my upcoming trips, but maybe in a few years it might come true.

Best regards from Switzerland,

Simisa (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use pictures for a book

Hello,

The SCÉRÉN (Service Culture Édition - Ressources pour l'Éducation Nationale) is the public network of editors of the French National Ministery of Education. We provide books, websites, CD/DVD-ROMs, etc. to help teachers carrying out their job. The CRDP (Centre Régional de Documentation Pédagogique) of the academy of Nice is the French southeast editor of this network. We are actually working on a book dedicated to history and geography for French high school teachers, titled "Pratiques à partager - Histoire - Géographie - 3e", and we urge to have the authorization to use these maps found on your website :

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010-10-18_10-54-52_Mozambique_Maputo_Cassana.jpg

So, could you please reply to my email (fabien.nguyen@ac-nice.fr) with your permission. We will of course send you a copy of the book when printed.

Please, let me know rapidly if we can use it.

Best regards,

-- Fabien NGUYEN Directeur des Editions CRDP de l'Académie de Nice 51 ter Avenue Cap de Croix 06101 NICE Cedex 2 Tél: 0493537326 http://www.cndp.fr/crdp-nice

Sites perso : http://fabien.nguyen.free.fr http://creafab.free.fr http://giscco.free.fr

Panorami

Hallo Simisa. Könnte ich bitte wissen warum die Kategorien Panorami von Amalfi und Panorami von Assisi die in der korrekten Category:Panoramics in Italy sich befanden, du sie in die falsche Category:Cities in Italy versetzt hast? Die Kategorie Cities in Italy betrifft NUR Gemeinden (Comuni) von Italien (also in unserem Fall: Amalfi und Assisi), und nicht unter-Kategorien der Gemeinden. Die Panorami von XY sind schon in den Gemeinden XY korrekt (unter)kategorisiert. Also ich habe deine Aenderungen rückgängig gemacht. Sonst eine gute Arbeit wünscht dir --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Denghi! Panorama-Bilder sind Aufnahmen, welche normalerweise horizontal oder vertikal aus mehreren Bildern zusammengesetzt sind. Es gibt natürlich auch andere Techniken, um Panoramabilder zu erstellen. Grundsätzlich unterscheiden sie sich aber im Format von "gewöhnlichen" Aufnahmen. Alle diese Bilder sind in den Commons unter "Panoramics" zusammengefasst. In der Unterkategorie "Panoramics by country" sind für alle möglichen Länder weitere Unterkategorien "Panoramics in XY" angelegt. Sinn dieser Kategorien ist es, Panoramabilder, welche sich von den üblichen Formaten unterscheiden, aus jedem Land abzulegen. In den von Dir angeführten beiden Kategorien befinden sich vorwiegend oder ausschliesslich ganz normale Bilder, welche m.E. nicht in die Kategorie "Panoramics" oder eine der Unterkategorien gehören. Entweder sollten die "normalen" Bilder in eine andere Kategorie umgeteilt werden oder dann eben die ganze Kategorie aus den "Panoramics" genommen werden.

Ich habe auch den Inhalt der Kategorie "Panorams of Italy" nach "Panoramics in Italy" verschoben und einen Redirect-Vermerk auf der Seite angebracht. Leider wurde diese Änderung wieder von jemandem gelöscht und somit existieren jetzt wieder zwei Kategorien mit grundsätzlich dem gleichen Inhalt und Zweck. Das ist für die Systematik der Commons nicht sinnvoll und widerspricht auch der geläufigen Syntax für die Länderkategorien in den "Panoramics". Es wäre hilfreich für die Suche von Bildern, wenn hier eine gemeinsame Syntax zur Anwendung kommen könnte.

Ich wünsche Dir ebenfalls viel Spass an der Arbeit in den Commons! Simisa (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ich verstehe was du meinst, aber es ging mir gar nicht um Panoramas und Panoramics, sondern um Cities in Italy, wo die Kategorie der Panoramas/Panoramics versetzt wurde, und wo sie absolut nicht hin gehört. Was dein Problem betrifft, ich glaube dass es an korrekte Information mangelt. Ich habe dasselbe Problem mit der Ornung (womit ich mich im Moment befasse) von Cities, Municipalities, Villages in Italy, in Province of, in Region of, und, und, und. etc. Ein totales Chaos! Weil nirgends geschrieben ist was man unter Cities, was unter Municipalities, was unter Villages zu verstehen muss. Nun mache ich ganz systematisch Ordnung, aber sehr bald werde ich in den betreffenden Haupt-Kategorien eine Einführung schreiben (auf en, it, fr, de) was da zu verstehen ist, was in die Kategorie hinein gehört und was nicht. Ich hab diese Einführungen schon geschrieben aber noch nicht eingesetzt weil die verschiedenen Texte auf den verschiedenen Sprachen noch nicht vollständig korrigiert sind. Ich glaube dass du auch sowas machen solltest: zuerst entscheiden was Panoramas oder Ansichten (oder wie du sie benennen willst), und was Panoramics sind; neue Kategorien machen wo sie fehlen oder mangelhaft sind; und dann im top der betreffenden Kategorien eine kurze Einführung in den verschiedenen Sprachen schreiben, in der du ganz genau erklärst um was es geht. Mach das! So wirst du und andere in Zukunft keine (oder weniger) Probleme haben! Herzlichst, --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lightning

Hello, I nominated your picture for featured image: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lightning 14.07.2009 20-42-33.JPG. The "wow" is certainly there. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dams and reservoirs

Hi, just wondering what you thought of my category description at Category:Dams in Switzerland. As all reservoirs (which generally include a dam) are already listed in Category:Reservoirs in Switzerland, there isn't much use in including them in both categories. Some reservoirs have a lot of images, so it might be worth doing a category specifically for the dam.

BTW, I like your images. Interesting to categorize them. -- User:Docu at 16:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my edits:

-- User:Docu at 16:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Docu! Thanks for your comments and your great work with my pics. I have noticed that you have categorized many of them during the past couple of weeks. Thanks for that!

As far as the dams are concerned, my thinking was that there is a main cat "Dams by country" with hardly any entry in "Dams in Switzerland". As most of the dams in Switzerland are used to produce electricity, I guess they better fit in this cat than into "Reservoirs" which has in my opinion the meaning of storing drinking water. Therefore I have started to shift many of the pics in the cat "Dams in Switzerland" into appropriate subcategories in order to avoid that all pics of dams in Switzerland will be stored in the main cat. I stopped for now, please let's discuss. Cheers, Simisa (talk) 16:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As many images in sub-categories of Category:Reservoirs in Switzerland are show dams, we could give this a try and eventually do specific subcategories for dams. Grande Dixence already splits the two, even though the other way round that I would generally do it (an exception as "Dix" is less known than "Dixence").

BTW According to the category description of Category:Reservoirs (current version), the scope of "reservoir" is larger ("artificial lakes", but not "cisterns", "water supply buildings", or "containers"). To some of extent, this matches the definition of en:reservoir ("a place or hollow vessel where fluid is kept in reserve, for later use. Most often, a reservoir refers to an artificial lake, used to store water for various uses"), but that could include natural lakes used that way. GNIS uses it as a feature class definition for the US: "artificially impounded body of water (lake, tank)". At en:Category:Reservoirs, some attempt to apply it to anything with a dam. For Swiss lakes, this might lead to Lake Lucerne being categorized as a "reservoir", because of its needle dam. ;) -- User:Docu at 11:52, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW Category:Lac de Sanetsch and Category:Sanetsch dam are somewhat like what I have in mind (there aren't too many pictures though). -- User:Docu at 12:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Stimme in FP candidates

Hallo Simisa. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pano-bayer-leverkusen.jpg habe ich eine überarbeitete Version des Bildes zur Wahl gestellt. Die Perspektive ist jetzt verbessert, so dass du vielleicht deine Contrastimme überdenken könntest. Danke, --S^[1] 20:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2009-05-21 Diessenhofen 01.jpg

Hi. Back in July, there were some problems with uploads. The above page currently doesn't have an image. You might want to try to re-upload it, otherwise you could also add {{Speedy}} to have it deleted. -- User:Docu at 10:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, just fine

Hi, I came across your uploaded photos and I must say that I am impressed. Accept my congratulations for your superb work and keep up giving beauty and art. Thanks for share them with all of us, --Factuarius (talk) 11:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Úlfljótsvatn, nicht Þingvallavatn

Servus Simisa, ich hab bei einigen deiner Bilder den Beschreibungstext geändert. Etwa bei File:Þingvallavatn Iceland 003.JPG: das Foto zeigt eindeutig den See de:Úlfljótsvatn und die Kirche der gleichnamigen Ortschaft. Der de:Þingvallavatn liegt unmittelbar nördlich dieses Sees. Grüße, --Wirthi (talk) 10:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Hallo Wirthi, danke für die Änderungen. Einige habe ich bereits selbst verschoben. Aber scheinbar sind mir einige durch die Lappen ;-) Gruss, Simisa (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[1]?-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahahahah, so that's what it is! I'm from Funchal myself, and I thought that the other place had some relation (theme park?) with my city, mainly due to the tourist plaque we can see in one of the photos. So it's a river, I presume that the name is a mere coincidence then. Thanks, -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 23:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that I have given you Autopatrolled rights. This does not affect your editing, but makes it easier for users watching Special:RecentChanges to find unhelpful edits. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 2a9c1033acb3ebaf77a2365d19853d02

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Schade

Hallo. Es ist schade, dass du bei deinen zahlriechen (guten) Bildern vom Schweizerischen Nationalpark nicht hingeschrieben hast, wo sie aufgenommen worden sind. So sind sie nur von sehr beschränktem Nutzen. --62.2.108.30 09:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich arbeite - leider - erst seit ca. 2 Jahren mit Geocoding über GPS. Wenn ich einmal Zeit haben sollte, werde ich die Positionen so genau wie möglich nachliefern. Simisa (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image usage for US TV Show

How can I contact photographer regarding rights to us aerial image(s) for a US TV show? Fisheggs (talk) 18:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Madeira

Dear Simisa, it's me who have to thank you for sharing such beautiful images of my home island. I'm not there at the moment (will be in a few weeks), and your photos have contributed to appease my nostalgia. I see as well that many of your images have been nominated as quality images, it's great to have such quality works on the subject. I hope in the near future to use them at wiki-pt, as I'll resume the work on the Madeira articles there. Cheers, -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 08:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roggenburg?

Hallo Simisa,

ist das links hinter der de:Insel Schwanau auf diesem Bild die Insel Roggenburg, oder ist das Festland? Falls ersters, was sind das für Gebäude auf der Insel Roggenburg? Ich schau gerade, ob genügend Material für einen eigenen Inselartikel zusammenkommt, nachdem es für Schwanau seit kurzem einen gibt. Gruß,--Ratzer1 (talk) 09:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallor Ratzer, das ist Festland! Sorry, kann Dir nicht helfen. Gruss Simisa (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Klar, dann ist das Foto vom Südufer aus aufgenommen. Denn vom Nordufer aus könnte man nicht links an der Insel vorbeisehen, ohne die kleinere Insel Roggenburg zu sehen. Aber noch eine Frage zum Foto der Insel Schwanau: Was ist das für ein Gebäude zwischen der Burgruine rechts und der St. Josefskapelle links (teils durch Gebüsch verdeckt). Das sieht fast aus wie ein altes Bauernhaus. Ein Museum vielleicht? Oder wohnt dort zeitweise oder dauernd jemand? Gruß,--Ratzer1 (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich befürchte, ich kann Dir hier nicht weiterhelfen! Ich habe nur auf einem Motorrad-Ausflug kurz angehalten an jener Stelle und ein paar Aufnahmen geschossen. Ich bin leider nicht ortskundig. Simisa (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lightning Picture usage?

Hi, I've been looking at your "File:Lightning_14.07.2009_20-42-33.JPG" picture, and I would like to inquire about using it for a project I'm working on. With your permission, I would like to use a cropped version of the image as a background on a 2 x 6 inch bookmark. The bookmark would have Bible verse references on it. It would be sold inexpensively (and possibly used as a giveaway item) at the not-for-profit Bible College Bookstore that I volunteer at. I can give you more details and even a preview file if you would like.... Thanks so much for your time! Starg8sg1 (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Starg8sg1, the picture is released the license indicated with the picture and may be used under those conditions. Simisa (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simisa, Thank you so much for getting back to me! I can credit you on the image if you would like. (I'll put something silimar to "Lightning Image by:" on it.) Should I put "Simisa" or would you rather have your name on it instead? Thanks!! Starg8sg1 (talk) 22:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please put Simisa on it! Thanks, Simisa (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kloster Sankt Katharinental

Hallo Simisa. Kannst du mir sagen, warum du die Aufnahmen vom Kloster Katharinenthal aus der *Category:Monasteries in the canton of Thurgau* entfernt hast? Wenn es heute auch kein Kloster mehr ist, so hat es doch die Geschichte eines Klosters und die typische Architektur, wie übrigens auch die meisten anderen "Klöster" in der Category. Ebenso verstehe ich nicht, warum man die Aufnahmen nicht in der Kategorie *Panoramics of the canton of Thurgau* lassen kann, zumal das Abgebildetet ja auf Thurgauer Boden steht (und das Format m.E. für die Einordungung so ziemlich wurst ist). Gerne erfahre ich dein Gründe.--Pingelig (talk) 12:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pingelig. Die Nennung des Bildes in der Kategorie "Monasteries in the canton of Thurgau" und in der Kategorie "Kloster Sankt Katharinental" entspricht einer Doppelnennung, da "Kloster Sankt Katharinental" bereits eine Unterkategorie von "Monasteries in the canton of Thurgau" ist. Solche Doppel- oder Mehrfachnennungen in der gleichen Struktur sind in den Commons nicht erwünscht. Gemäss den Richtlinien auf Commons soll zudem immer der Aufnahmeort und nicht der Ort des Subjekts angegeben werden. Und das ist in diesem Fall eben Gailingen in Deutschland. Simisa (talk) 12:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast Recht, was den Aufnahmeort angeht und theoretisch natürlich auch mit der "Doppelnennung". Allerdings ist die Doppelnennung ja nur ein Problem in grossen und dadurch unübersichtlichen Kategorien. *Monasteries in ...Thurgau* ist eine kleine und sehr übersichtliche Kategorie und wird es wohl auch bleiben, da es so viele Klöster ja nun auch wieder nicht im Thurgau gibt. Ich finde es praktisch, in einer solch kleinen Kategorie eine Schnellübersicht mit Beispielbildern zu haben, um dann in der entsprechenden Unterkategorie ein passendes Bild zu suchen. Natürlich könnte man zu diesem Zweck auch eine Bildgalerie anlegen, aber in einer kleinen Kategorie scheint mir dieser Aufwand übertrieben, wenn man dem Zweck viel einfacher entsprechen kann. Liege ich da so falsch?--Pingelig (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Durch die Mehrfachnennung eines Bildes in der gleichen Kategorien-Hierarchie geht eben auch die Übersichtlichkeit verloren. Stell Dir nur einmal vor, das gleiche Bild würde auch noch in "Buildings in the canton of Thurgau", "Canton of Thurgau" und zuletzt noch "Switzerland" eingereiht. Alle Kategorien wären grundsätzlich korrekt. Aber damit würde die Übersichtlichkeit der höher gestellten Hierarchieknoten vollkommen verloren gehen. Deshalb sollte die Nennung nur einmal in einem Hierarchiestrang erfolgen. Simisa (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was die grossen Kategorien (die du als Beispiele anführst) angeht, sehe ich das ja ein. Aber wir sprechen hier von einer kleinen Unterkategorie.--Pingelig (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tehran_25.11.2009_11-51-48.JPG

File:Tehran_25.11.2009_11-51-48.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! =]

I like to get your permission to your wonderful images on Iran particularly those on Persepolis in the wikipedia article en: Achaemenid architecture, with your persmision. I know the images allow me to use them, but I always like to make sure of the blessing of the producer before utilizing them. Cheers! Dr. Persi (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to use all my pictures as per the respective lisence! Simisa (talk) 06:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Märstetten/Tägerwilen

So liest man sich wieder. O.k., das Photo ist also vom Luftgebiet über Tägerwilen her aufgenommen worden (gilt die Von-wo-aus-aufgenommen-Regel wirklich auch bei Luftaufnahmen?! Vom eigentlichen Tägerwilen aus würde man das Abgebildete auf keinen Fall sehen). Auf jeden Fall ist das Dorf, welches abgebildet ist, nicht Tägerwilen sondern Märstetten.(Praktisch) jeder, der das Bild in der Kategorie findet, wird denken, das abgebildete Dorf sei Tägerwilen, es sei denn, er kennt sich genügend gut aus, um zu merken, dass das nicht sein kann. Es sollte wenigstens in der Beschreibung vermerkt sein, dass das abgebildete Dorf Märstetten ist. Und meiner Ansicht nach sollte eine Luftaufnahme von einem Dorf (egal von wo aus aufgenommen, Zürich, Zeppelin, Orbit, Mond, etc.) in dessen Kategorie eingereiht sein. Ist doch Schade um dein Foto, wenn es in der Kategorie "Tägerwilen" rumdümpelt, wo niemand was damit anfangen kann. Beste Grüsse --Pingelig (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Hallo Pingelig! Ich weiss, Du schätzt diese Regel nicht. Der Aufnahmestandort (oder sollte man hier sagen Aufnahmeflugort?) liegt auf dem Gebiet der Gemeinde Tägerwilen. Aber man kann das Problemchen ganz einfach lösen, indem man den Infotext ändert, z.B. auf "Märstetten from overhead Tägerwilen". Dass man die Kategorie "Märstetten" ebenfalls noch dazufügt, ist m.E. kein Problem. Ich werde das Bild 'mal so anpassen. Im übrigen danke ich Dir für die aufmerksame Durchsicht meiner Bilder. Gruss Simisa (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Danke meinerseits. --Pingelig (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Osterfingen

Deine Bilder der Weinberge von Osterfingen sind absoult spitze! Herzliche Gratulation. DidiWeidmann (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freut mich, wenn sie Dir gefallen! -- Simisa (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files by User:simisa

Hi Simisa,

If you are interested, I can have my bot add Special:Search/simisa -incategory:"Files_by_User:simisa" to the category. -- Docu at 10:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Docu, that would be fantastic! Many thanks in advance! -- Simisa (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Seems to work just fine: [2] [3] [4] - -- Docu at 05:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006-05-22-125105 Iceland Reykjavík.jpg

File:2006-05-22-125105 Iceland Reykjavík.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fingalo (talk) 21:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-05-16 12 21 35 Iceland-Gilsbakki.jpg

File:2008-05-16 12 21 35 Iceland-Gilsbakki.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Fingalo (talk) 15:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Island-Bilder

Hallo Simisa,

Bilder, die urheberrechtlich geschützte Kunstwerke in Island zeigen, werden auf Commons nicht akzeptiert, auch nicht, wenn sie im Freien stehen, weil die Panoramafreiheit in Island eingeschränkt ist. Bitte lade solche Bilder bei der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia hoch, dort werden sie akzeptiert. Gruß --Rosenzweig δ 17:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisieren

Ich hab mal eben die Bilder von Someone35 kategorisiert. Das geht bei mir schneller, als bei ihr, weil sie sich offensichtlich noch nicht im Kategorienbaum auskennt. Aber das Bild File:Piled rocks, iceland.jpg bringe ich nicht unter. Ich bin mal dort gewesen, aber ich erinnere mich nicht mehr, wo das war. Fingalo (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Die Aufnahme zeigt Laufskalavarda im Mýrdalssandur. Es gibt dafür noch keine Kategorie und ich schlage daher vor, das Bild vorläufig der Kategorie Mýrdalssandur zuzuordnen. Ich habe das einmal gemacht und wenn später noch mehr Bilder dazu kommen sollten, kann dann immer noch eine eigene Kategorie eröffnet werden. -- Simisa (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Fingalo (talk) 11:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gelsenkirchen Buer Panorama.png

Hi, due to a known bug in the software, Commons doesn't create thumbnails of PNG files with more than 12.5 million pixels. There is nothing wrong with the picture itself. Jcb (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that then; I did not know about the bug. -- Simisa (talk) 19:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem :-) - Jcb (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:2011-09-28 16-49-00 Iran.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

_→AzaToth 17:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich gebe meinen Bilder Namen mit Datum, Zeit, Land, Region, Ort und Unterort. Iranische Namen aus Geonames.org enthalten aber Schriftzeichen, welche nicht problemlos von allen Editierprogrammen erkannt werden. Daher die Reduktion auf Datum, Zeit und Land in gewissen Fällen. -- Simisa (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-08-02 11-38-23 Switzerland La Rösa.jpg

Hallo Simisa,
Ich habe bei Deinem Bild am Text geabeitet und Links angefügt.
Beim Betrachten des Bildes ist mir der Mitteleinstiegwagen hinter dem ABe 8/12 aufgefallen, der eigentlich auf der Berninabahn nichts zu suchen hat. Ich habe dazu eine Note hinzugefügt. Kannst Du bestätigen, ob mein Note-Text OK ist, ich habe nämlich den Fahrplan durchgewühlt und nichts von einem regulären Einsatz – als "Velowagen"? – gesehen.
Herzliche Grüsse --Lord Koxinga (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lord Koxinga, besten Dank für Deine Anmerkung. Die Anmerkung ist ok., wie sind am Abend sogar im Velowagen von der Station Morteratsch bis nach Pontresina mitgefahren. Ich vermute, dass der Wagen wegen des grossen Andrangs beigestellt wurde. Gruss Simisa (talk) 21:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Simisa,
Danke für Deine schnelle Antwort.
Sie hat gezeigt, dass ich das richtig wahrgenommen habe.
Ich habe aber trotzdem noch eine Anpassung vorgenommen. Mitteleinstiegswagen ist zwar sicher korrekt, aber ich denke, es ist ein SIG-Leichtstahlwagen für die Rhätische Bahn und nicht ein SWS-Leichtstahlwagen für die Rhätische Bahn.
Mea Culpa und Herzliche Grüsse --Lord Koxinga (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

File:2010-04-11_16_16_44_HB-IXU_Switzerland_Hell.jpg

File:2010-04-11_16_16_44_HB-IXU_Switzerland_Hell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biggerben (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010-04-11_16_06_21_HB-JVG_Switzerland_Hell.jpg

File:2010-04-11_16_06_21_HB-JVG_Switzerland_Hell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Biggerben (talk) 10:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photos

Hello,

I'd love to use some of your pics for re-sale. What are your attribution requirements. You can contact me at roman.banfield@gmail.com if you like.

Thanks!

Roman

A Phoenix beer for you!

Thank you, for the panoramic photo of Mauritius on Wikipedia!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/2007-09-09_Mauritius_24.jpg Kaushal.Dalmond (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One only? ;-) Simisa (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fuerteventura

Hallo Simisa, könntest Du bei Deinen Bildern aus Fuerteventura bitte auch die Ortschaften (Category:Municipalities in Fuerteventura) kategorisieren? Das würde mir beim Aufräumen eine Menge Arbeit ersparen und Du weißt ja sowieso besser als ich, wo genau Du warst. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 11:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo les! Mache ich eigentlich meist. Ich lege aber nicht alle Ortschaften neue an, wenn man sie auf den Bildern nicht sieht. Ich habe mir auch einige Zeit genommen, um in die Kategorie Fuerteventura Strukturen einzubringen. Aber optimal ist es noch nicht. Ich werde aber die Ortschaften so viel wie möglich angeben auf den nächsten Uploads. Gruss -- Simisa (talk) 12:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Panoramics in Baden-Württemberg

Es wäre schon noch gut, wenn du eine solche Kategorie erst dann einfügst, wenn du sicher bist, dass das entsprechende Bild aus Baden-Württemberg ist. Meines Wissens gehört der Aargau nach wie vor zur Schweiz ;-) (z.B. hier und hier) -- Badener 08:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Badener, es wäre auch gut, wenn Du Dich an die Regeln hältst und dass Bild dort kategorisierst, wo es gemacht worden ist. Deshalb heissen die Kategorien auch "Panoramics in ..." und nicht "Panoramics of ...". Es besteht immer noch die Möglichkeit, einzelne Komponenten des Bildes mit Beschriftungsfeldern zu versehen oder zu kategoriesieren, wie z.B. mit "Lägern". Die Küssaburg liegt m.W. in Baden-Württemberg und daher ist die Kategorie "Panoramics in Baden-Württemberg" korrekt. Zudem gibt es in der Kategorie "Panoramics in Switzerland" für jeden Kanton eine Unter-Kategorie. Wenn alle Panoramabilder der Schweiz in einer Kategorie abgelegt werden, dann haben wir in kürzester Zeit ein Chaos. Gruss, -- Simisa (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry, bei der Lägern habe ich einen Fehler gemacht. Aber Tegerfelden habe ich wirklich im Aargau fotografiert ;-) -- Badener 20:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem, ich versuche nur, die Hauptkategorie sauber zu halten. Beim Bild in Tegerfelden habe ich Deinen ungefähren Standort a.G. von Google Earth zu erahnen versucht und habe angenommen, dass Du über den Rhein fotografiert hast. ;-) -- Simisa (talk) 23:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Americophile 00:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tehran 25.11.2009 11-51-48.JPG

File:Tehran 25.11.2009 11-51-48.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Americophile 00:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007-06-16 Thurbrücke Andelfingen.jpg

Die Category:Thurbrücke Andelfingen ist für die Eisenbahnbrücke, nicht für die Strassenbrücken → Holzbrücke und Autostrassenbrücke. Wenn du die separat kategorisieren willst, bitte entsprechende Kategorien anlegen. Aktuell ist dieses Bild bei Category:Thur und Category:Andelfingen richtig aufgehoben. -- Хрюша ^?? 13:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category Delete

Category:Vladivostok Avia and Category:Airbus A320 (Vladivostok Avia) are request to delete. They are empty. The content are moved to Vladivostok Air. --Toen96 (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krafla Geothermal Power Station 21.05.2008 15-31-19.JPG

File:Krafla Geothermal Power Station 21.05.2008 15-31-19.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JD554 (talk) 12:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified several of your photos into a "virtual reality" format

I have added them to my non-commercial website Very Big Photos, under your posted stipulations.

You can find the website at: http://verybigphotos.com

Thanks for the great photos.

Philkon (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Phil Konstantin[reply]

Hi Phil, thanks for your information. Can you probably add my name to all of my pictures you are using, i.e. also those from Jordan (Wadi Rum), Iran, Malawi etc. Otherwise, cool website! Cheers, simisa

Fotoflüge

Hallo Simisa, bei meiner Rumschnüffelei bin ich hier auf was gestoßen. Wäre das was für Dich? Gruß --El. (talk) 13:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo El., danke für den Tipp. Ich habe meinen Schein verfallen lassen :-( Fliegen ist ein schönes, leider aber auch zeitaufwändiges Hobby! -- Simisa (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Da kann man nur etwas traurig hinterherschauen. Um ein Haar hätte ich auch mal einen Segelflugschein bekommen. Damals konnte ich beobachten, dass die Piloten oft von Ihren Familien getrennt die Freizeit verbracht haben. Man kann nur eines haben... Aber nochmal Thema Fotoflug: Vielleicht hast Du ja entsprechende Serien schon in Deinem Fundus? --El. (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Val Mingèr

Hallo! Du hast viele Fotos aus dem Schweizerischen Nationalpark auf WP. Gibt es auch eines zur Val Mingèr, dass du WP zur Verfügung stellen kannst? Es würd mich freuen :-) --Panda17 (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Panda17! Nein, tut mir leid; vom Val Mingèr habe ich gar nichts und war - leider - auch noch nie dort. Gruss -- Simisa (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dubai Airport 16.08.2009 05-18-10.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramics

I have undone your edit that placed Category:Panoramics in Category:Volgograd. Clearly there can be panoramics that have nothing to do with Volgograd and, indeed, most panoramics will have nothing to do with Volgograd. - Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Germany Baden-Wurttemberg image

Hello Simisa,

I wanted to let you know that we were interested in using your image for small digital samples in our retail stores. Credit would be given, likely posted on the back of the sample, following the guidelines established for Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). If you have any questions please let me know. I also wanted to say that I enjoyed the opportunity to view your photography on Wikimedia Commons.

File:2007-04-27 15-01-09 Germany Baden-Württemberg Lausheim.jpg

All the best,

Chris

Canada, BC

Hi Chris,

That's fine for me and I am happy to hear that you enjoy the pics!

Best regards to BC!

simisa

Permission to use image in advertising

hello,

i work for an ad agency and would like to use one of your images in a commercial for one of our clients. Can you please email me (sb1211sf@yahoo.com) as soon as possible to let me know if this would be okay and to discuss the details?

thanks!

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2010-10-21_13-12-21_-_Malawi_-_Njolomole.JPG. I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --65.130.202.239 16:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lohn SH

Hallo Simisa,

alles klar, ich war noch nie in Lohn :-), aber dann müsste eher die Kategorie "Büttenhardt" raus, oder? --Holder (talk) 10:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Port_Louis_(harbour)

Port Louis (harbour) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kingroyos (talk) 11:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2008-03-20 Dubai, Wafi Shopping Mall 02.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 23:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Luzern

moved, [quotation]

moved, [quotation start]

Bilder Luzern

Hallo Roland Du hast viele meine Bilder von Luzern in den Ordner "Unidentified locations of Lucerne" verschoben. Das verstehe ich nicht ganz, da alle Bilder 'geotagged' sind und der Aufnahmeort daher sehr genau ersehen werden kann. Gruss Simisa (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[quotation end]

Hallo Simisa, richtig, gleichzeitig aber auch eine deutlich grössere Anzahl Uploads exakter kategorierisiert als 'nur' Category:Lucerne ;-)

In der "Hauptkategorie" waren viele der Bilder m.E. 'falsch' platziert respective (einige wenige auch von Dir) gleichzeitig bereits mit einer 'passenderen' Unter-Kategorie versehen.

Persönlich kenne ich mich in Luzern zwar es bizzeli aus, sprich habe gleichzeitig einige Dutzend Bilder 'passender' kategorisiert, aber viele 'Gebäude/Monumente' kann ich nicht exakt zuordnen.

So Du's mittels geotag kannst, dann Dankeschön für exaktere Kategorisierung, ansonsten wird das sicherlich jemand 'Ortskundiger' (irgendwann)vornehmen.

'Zwischenlösung': Mittels dem absolut genialen Tool HotCat mit einem Mausclick die Grosse Mehrheit nach "Buildings in ..." verschieben, was mE aber eine spätere Fein-Kategorisierung nicht vereinfacht.

Liebe Grüsse, Roland 21:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Roland, ich kenne mich leider auch nicht so gut aus in Luzern und ich hoffe, dass sich jemand findet für die Feinkategorisierung. Mir ist die Sache nicht so wichtig. LG Simisa (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salü Simisa, dankeschön, einige konnte ich noch vage (=Reuss in Luzern) kategoririseren, und ja, mit der Zeit wird sich sicher ein/e ExpertIn für Luzern noch Deiner Bilder annehmen :-) Liebe Grüsse, Roland 20:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

110313

Hallo Herr Krapf,

ich bin auf Ihre exzellenten aerial-images zur Oberen Donau (Schloss Bronnen) von 2005/6 in den commons categories gestoßen. Da ich zur Geologie der Schwäbischen Alb Texte und images in wiki(p/m)edia.org publiziere und da Sie in Ihrem commons User:Simisa schreiben

"...please do not hesitate to contact me for a full resolution version. I am pleased to share them."

wollte ich anfragen, ob Sie noch Fotos von der Donau um das Schloss Bronnen haben, die ich bisher nicht gefunden habe, mir aber von Ihnen vorstellen kann....

Hier ihr Foto, welches die Schüssel ansatzweise zeigt:

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aerials BW 20.09.2005 15-34-54.jpg

Für meinen Artikel

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zementmergelschüssel

suche ich noch ein aerial, welches folgenden Dateien nahekommt (beide noch urheberrechtlich geschützt - 1958, 1979. Dafür habe ich -noch- keine permission):

ulrich-tichy.de/Zementmergelschüssel Schloss-Bronnen Obere-Donau.jpg

bzw. die Graphik

ulrich-tichy.de/graph Zementmergelschüssel Schloss-Bronnen Obere-Donau.jpg

Auch Tipps, wo sich das Suchen noch lohnen kann, sind willkommen.

Ich bin auch per Email erreichbar, siehe

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Ustill

und

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:ulrichstill

By the way: Die Liste Photographien etc. ist jeweils eine andere!

Vielen Dank

Ulrich Tichy

Panoramas Iceland

Hello Hanuseli, within a project of introducing new page banners at Wikivoage (Wikivoyage:Banner_Expedition), I have used your pretty panoramas (see VW: Iceland, VW: Route_1-Ring_Road). I used your original files and cropped them to 7:1 ratio and saved in a designated destination http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikivoyage_banners_of_Iceland in a reduced resolution. I hope I used your pictures correctly and you agree with using these and perhaps other pictures of yours for wikivoyage. --Danapit (talk) 09:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

profile for Wikimedia blog?

Hi Hansueli, my name is Matthew and I work on the Communications team with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Foundation blog where we profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/

Given that one of your photos is scheduled for 15 May 2013, I'd love to do a short interview with you by email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested!

Thanks, Matthew (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diesel locomotives in Namibia

Dear Hansueli,

A British railway journal may be interested in using your photo of the train crossing the desert in Nambia (File:2008-06-27 12-57-03 Namibia Erongo Narraville.JPG).

Do you by any chance have a version with higher resolution than 2MB?

If so, please email me, PK Ash at wheeltapper@yahoo.com.

Thanks very much - beautiful pic.

cheers

Paul

File:2011-06-04 16-30-08 Germany Baden-Württemberg Randen.jpg

Hallo Simisa, das Bild ist ja schon mal bei den Featured pictures durchgefallen, weil einige Juroren sich keinen enzyklopädischen Wert vorstellen konnten. Für mich illustriert es am ehesten eine bestimmte sommerliche Wolkenbildung. Um das enzyklopädisch zu verwerten, müsste man zunächst den Wolkentypus herausfinden und das Bild dort einordnen. Vielleicht irgendwo unter Category:Cumulus clouds (siehe auch Cumulus), vielleicht ist es auch eine Cumulonimbuswolke in der Entstehung. Bei der genauen Bestimmung kann ich allerdings nicht helfen. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2011-06-22 11-37-39 South Africa - Morningside.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 23:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-05-22 14-10-42 Iceland - Akureyri.JPG

File:2008-05-22 14-10-42 Iceland - Akureyri.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006-05-25-172807 Iceland Hólmahverfi.jpg

File:2006-05-25-172807 Iceland Hólmahverfi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2006-05-22-134753 Iceland Reykjavík.jpg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2011-06-22 11-49-36 South Africa - Morningside.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 07:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Peaks_in_Oregon

Peaks in Oregon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jsayre64 (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to Use Image for Documentary

Dear Simisa,

I've had the good fortune of coming across one of your amazing photos - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenya_Aerial_2009-08-27_14-27-32.JPG

I work at a production house and we would like to use one of your photos for an international documentary.

I'll like to ensure we credit you properly. As such, would it be possible for you to email me at charlene.chan@infocusasia.com so that I may be able to tell you more about our project and gain your permission to use the photo?

Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon!

MH370 / 9M-MRO Airliner Permission and Backstory Request

Hello Simisa-

I hope this finds you well,

I've been in touch with many other Planespotters in regards to the Flight 370 story and I would love to feature yours. It's incredible that you were able to capture this aircraft back in 2011 given it's story in modern aviation history.

I wanted to get your feelings about the image you took of the Malaysia Airlines missing airliner. Was there any back story to the image and when you took it? Emotions felt when you heard the news?

I'd like to feature your story and image along with other assembled 9M-MRO photographer stories on my blog. This project is a non-profit storytelling tribute on behalf of this unfolding story. All images would be credited back to you and collections.

I've already heard from Austria, Istanbul, Frankfurt, Rome to Los Angeles

South Africa would be a wonderful addition. Thanks, I hope to hear from you.

I can be reached at michael_raisch@yahoo.com

My photo and history work is available at www.raischstudios.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-01 14-27-44 HB-JMH.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-05-23 17 Road No 1 at Krossanes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition. .--ArildV 00:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, nice to hear! - BTW I did promote some other pictures on the am. page.Reykholt (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-05-25 14 33 56 Iceland-Þingvellir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-05-25 14 04 07 Iceland-Þingvellir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-05-25 15 Nesjavellir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 11:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-05-07 09-45-34 Iceland - Vík Vík í Mýrdal 6h 146°.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-11-03 15-53-14 Belgium - Humelgem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2006-05-22-112412 Iceland Hveragerði.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-05-01 10-17-43 Iceland - Fosshólli Svalbarðseyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elephants of Kruger National Park

There is no need for an additional category definig the elephant species as in Kruger National Park you only find Loxodonta africana, and if you follow the categoy tree (Category:Elephants of Kruger National Park --> Category:Elephants of South Africa --> Category:Loxodonta africana by location) , it will lead to the correct species --Kersti (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-05-15 18 18 41 Iceland-Reynivellir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bernina_Lagalp_station

Category:Bernina_Lagalp_station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

NAC (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2011-09-28 16-30-41 Iran Tehran Milad Tower 2vp.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006-05-23-190838 Iceland Skaftafell.jpg

File:2006-05-23-190838 Iceland Skaftafell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2006-05-21-120825 Iceland Vaðlækir.jpg

And also:

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bakoven

Hi there.

Not really sure how to go about this, so my apologies if this is the wrong forum for it. The page 'Bakoven', about an area in Cape Town, has an image purportedly of that area (that I understand to be your image), but the image is actually of Oranjezicht (you can see similar images on the page for Oranjezicht), which is a different part of Cape Town. I didn't want to just go and edit the page, in case you had simply mixed up photos and had a replacement.

Regards, rhynhardtk

Hi rhynhardtk, Please feel free to change categories to any more suitable one. The name of my pictures is from the geonames.org server and the categories are either selected to my best knowledge or often also changed by other users. Best regards, Simisa (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos

Hello. Why are you removing "Videos" category without adding any other? Okras (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Okras! Please read the header of the category with the request to file the all files in an appropriate sub-category. Nobody will find a video file in the category "Videos" as there were hundreds of files and to find a particular one is more ore less impossible without going through all of them. It is a matter of the uploaders to tag them correctly with an appropriate category. Simisa (talk) 13:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's harder to find videos at main category. But let's check File:Operações_de_venda_Venda_Avulsa.theora.ogv, for example. Before your "fix" someone could visit that category and clarify file's categories. Now it has no category at all, so the only to find it - by it's name. So, I think it was bad idea to remove this one without adding any other. Okras (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014-10-24 07-32-11 Italy Veneto Bibione.jpg

Please note that "VENICE" is a main category requiring frequent diffusion and maybe maintenance. As many pictures and media files as possible should be moved into the right subcategories. For this pcture, the right category might be indeed : "Venice Marco Polo Airport". This category is a subcategory of Venice and therefore redundant with category "Venice"; therefore, cat Venice should be removed. Abxbay (talk) 14:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe/r Teilnehmer/in des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014,

Herzlichen Dank dass du zu Wiki4Alps beigetragen und deine Bilder mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast.

Im Rahmen des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs sind über 2500 Bilder von Kulturgütern in alpinen Regionen auf Wikimedia Commons geladen worden. Und die Jury ist daran, diese Bilder zu bewerten.

Wir kommen so bald wie möglich wieder auf Dich zu, um die Gewinner bekannt zu geben.

Auf der Wettbewerbsseite http://wiki4alps.ch findet ihr alle notwendigen Informationen, oder ihr könnt euch auch gerne an info@wikimedia.ch wenden.

Mit den besten Grüssen, Das Organisationskomittee

WLM CH (Français)

Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH 2014,

Nous vous remercions de votre contribution à Wiki4Alps, et de partager vos photos avec le monde entier!

Le concours a réuni plus de 2500 photos du patrimoine culturel des Alpes et le jury a commencé l'évaluation.

Nous reviendrons bientôt pour annoncer les gagnants.

Vous trouverez sur le site web du concours http://wiki4alps.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch.

Avec nos salutations les meilleures, le comité d'organisation.

WLM CH (English)

Dear participants to the WLM CH contest 2014,

Thank you for having contributed to Wiki4Alps and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

The contest gathered more than 2,500 pictures of cultural heritage objects of the Alps and the jury is currently evaluating them.

We will come back soon to announce the winners.

You will find the contest's website http://wiki4alps.ch necessary information there or you may write to us using the following address: info@wikimedia.ch.

With our warmest regards, The organising committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014

Grazie per aver contribuito a Wiki4Alps e per aver condiviso le tue fotografie con tutto il mondo!

Il concorso ha collezionato più di 2.500 fotografie del patrimonio culturale delle Alpi e la giuria ha cominciato la valutazione.

Presto saranno noti i vincitori.

Per ulteriori informazioni si prega di visitare il sito web http://wiki4alps.ch o potete scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch.

Con i nostri migliori saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu 10 Jahre Commons! Tolle Fotos, vielen Dank! Eben über die FUE-Fotos entdeckt. :) Sebaso (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nutzung von Cat-a-lot ohne nachzudenken

Hallo Simisa. Durch gedankenlose Kategorie-Entfernungen wie Special:Diff/154327508, Special:Diff/154327131, Special:Diff/154327503 oder Special:Diff/154327511 hast du die Bilder komplett aus den ortsbezogenen Kategoriebäumen entfernt und teilweise gar komplett kategorienlos gemacht. IP-Benutzer oder Neubenutzer hätte man für sowas wohl gesperrt.
Ich bitte dich, deine Kategorie-Entfernungen durchzugehen, um deinen Schaden zu beheben, und künftig Cat-a-lot vorsichtiger einzusetzen. --Leyo 20:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Leyo. Ich habe beim löschen nicht nur nachgedacht, sondern auch nachgelesen. Das Thema, was alles in die Kategorie Panoramen hineingehört, hatten wir nämlich schon einmal und auch wenn keine abschliessende Regelung gefunden wurde bestand immerhin Einigkeit darüber, dass Standardformate nicht in diese Kategorien gehören. Ich denke, die fraglichen Bilder wären viel besser in der Kategorie Historical photographs of Switzerland, bzw. einer neu zu eröffnenden Kategorie über Bern, untergebracht. Simisa (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Du scheinst meinen Text oben nicht verstanden zu haben. Es geht darum, dass du die Kategorien entfernt hast, ohne sie durch eine andere ortsbezogene Kategorie zu ersetzen (sofern diese nicht schon vorhanden ist). Bitte gehe deine Edits durch und ergänze – wo nötig – passende ortsbezogene Kategorien. --Leyo 23:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Und, hast du deine Vollentkategorisierungen inzwischen korrigiert? Falls nicht, bis wann machst du's? --Leyo 14:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich.

Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid!

Mit besten Grüssen,

Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français)

Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH,

La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément.

Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer!

Meilleurs messages,

Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English)

Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant,

We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually.

Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks.

This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join!

With our best regards,

The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente.

Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi.

Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti!

Saluti,

Il Comitato Organizzatore

File:2014-04-29 12-34-15 Iceland - Siglufirði Siglufjörður.JPG

File:2014-04-29 12-34-15 Iceland - Siglufirði Siglufjörður.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-05-18 08 59 24 Iceland-Hvammstangi.jpg

File:2008-05-18 08 59 24 Iceland-Hvammstangi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umbenennung einiger Deiner Dateien

Hallo Simisa (oder Hansueli, was meinem eigenen Vornamen näher kommt). Zunächst mal ein Kompliment für Deine teilweise phantastisch schönen bzw. guten (nicht immer dasselbe!) Aufnahmen, auch außerhalb des von mir hauptsächlich bearbeiteten Luftfahrtbereichs!

In einem anderen Punkt möchte ich gerne Kontakt mit Dir aufnehmen, bevor es zu Verschiebungen kommt. Deine Flugzeugbilder sind meist als "2011-05-01 16-14-06 Switzerland Kanton Zürich Zürich International Airport", "... Kloten Kaserne", "... Hagenbuechen", "Grundbuck-Gässli" oder ähnlich benannt. Vermutlich sind das die Aufnahme-Positionen. Ich bin kein Paragraphenreiter, aber die WP-Richtlinie Commons:File renaming, hier insbesondere "Which files should be renamed?" finde ich doch sehr sinnvoll: Punkt 2.: "To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image displays." Näher erläutert noch einmal in der Fußnote 2., Erläuterungen Punkt 7: "... that do not describe the subject of the file." Genau das ist der Punkt: Die jetzigen, im Text oft mehrfach identischen Titel sind zwar nicht "meaningless", beschreiben aber eben nicht das Motiv der Bilder (ich würde sie mal nicht als Dadaism einstufen).

Vorgesehener Inhalt des file name (aviation): Obwohl sehr oft nicht beachtet, gehören hier bei "Aircraft" nach dem uralten Konsens rein: Typ, Betreiber, evtl. noch Kennzeichen. Bereits der Aufnahmeort war damals strittig, und das Datum soll ebenso wenig rein wie der Autorenname. Dein "Swiss Airbus A340 HB-JMH approaching runway 14 at Zurich International Airport" kommt diesem Ideal schon sehr nahe, auch wenn man die Notwendigkeit von "approaching runway 14" und "International" im file name sicher diskutieren könnte.

Wenn man nun - statt einen Teil des jetzigen file name zu überschreiben - die kompletten Bezeichnungen für Typ, Betreiber und ggf. Kennzeichen einfach davor stellt, wird es ellenlang. Datum und Uhrzeit sind in der description dupliziert (also überschreibbar), aber vielleicht könnten Kategorien für die Aufnahme-Orte eingerichtet werden, damit es nicht ausufert? Ich freue mich auf Deine Vorschläge. Viele Grüße --Uli Elch (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm - gibt es noch Interesse an der Beantwortung meiner Anfrage oder soll ich einfach loslegen? --Uli Elch (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Uli! Ich habe Deinen Post erst heute gelesen, nachdem ich über das Wochenende wieder einmal ein paar Bilder hochgeladen habe. Wie Du vielleicht gesehen hast, habe ich mehr als 12'000 Bilder hochgeladen. Diese sind seit ca. 6 Jahren alle nach der gleichen Syntax benannt: Datum, Zeit, Land, Bundesland, Ortschaft, Ort. Die Umbenennung der Bilder erfolgt automatisch durch Geosetter, wobei die Ortsbezeichnungen wiederum von GeoNames übernommen werden. Nun kann man sich natürlich darüber streiten was sinnvoller ist: Den Bildinhalt im Bildnamen zu beschreiben oder den Ort der Bildaufnahme. Ich vertrete eher die Ansicht, dass der Zugriff auf den Bildinhalt durch eine korrekte Kategorisierung erfolgt und nicht über den Bildnamen. Sollte aber in der "Aviation group" eine andere Philosophie vorherrschen, so habe ich auch keine Mühe damit, wenn meine Bilder umbenannt werden. Ich selbst werde allerdings meiner Linie treu bleiben, vor allem auch daher, dass die Voranstellung des Datums und der Zeit eine eindeutige Sortierung erlaubt und doppelte Bezeichnungen unmöglich werden. Um Deine Frage zu beantworten: Dann leg mal los! Gruss Simisa (talk) 08:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2011-06-26 11-43-37 Mauritius Flacq Poste de Flacq 8hl.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 22:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-05-09_10-12-23_Austria_Tirol_Boden.jpg

Hello,

Found your photo over Boden, Austria:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2011-05-09_10-12-23_Austria_Tirol_Boden.jpg

Was that taken from a mountaintop looking down at the lake and the village? Was there a cable car to help reach the altitude?

Or aerial photo suggests it was taken from a plane? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wco81 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all pictures marked with aerial are taken from a plane, drone or anything else flying. In this case from a plane during the approach into Munich. Simisa (talk) 08:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of photo in publication

Hello, I would like to contact you about permission to use one of your photographs: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010-10-21_13-29-05_Mozambique_Tete_Chirobue.JPG in a publication (non-commercial) I am working on. The work would be credited as follows: “2010-10-21 13-29-05 Mozambique Tete Chirobue” by Hansueli Krapf, CC BY-SA 3.0. Please contact me at fuenvan@yahoo.com at your earliest convenience. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.232.3.98 (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your request, which is actually unnecessary as the given license does allow the requested use. Simisa (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

revert of description

Hi Simisa, You reverted my addition to a file description with the edit summary comment that I should not add information to the description. Why not? · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 04:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, Please feel free to add categories to my pictures or to blame me for a wrong description on my discussion page. You can also change the descriptions of my pictures, if they are wrong. Bit it does not help anyone if you write texts like "This is not..., it is ....". The file name comes from geonames.org and is generated automatically. It is also an option to contribute to the accuracy of geonames.org by joining and contributing to more precise locations. On top of Table Mountains all pictures are for this reason assigned to Camps Bay, but this does not mean that Camps Bay can be seen on the picture. Simisa (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2014-04-27 12-04-37 Iceland - Kópavogi Kópavogur.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MRU

Template:MRU has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Russian Rocky (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Simisa,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2010-04-25 04 08 10 Iran Tehran Exhibition.jpg

File:2010-04-25 04 08 10 Iran Tehran Exhibition.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

4nn1l2 (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-06-01 09-54-22 Norwegen Borkenes Reinstad 3.0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WQL 07:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-05-30 14-21-58 Norwegen Kjeldebotn Doaresgáddi 0.8-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-06-05 12-10-58 Norwegen Laupstad Vestpollen 33.1-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Amazing. --Podzemnik 00:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-04-29 12-01-53 Schweiz Dörflingen Laag 550.9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-06-01 12-28-58 Norwegen Borkenes Finnsæter 3.4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 17:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-04-29 10-07-41 Schweiz Dörflingen Gennersbrunn 527.7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-15 12-45-02 Iceland - Laugarvatni Laugarvatn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-04-29 12-00-50 Schweiz Dörflingen Dörflingen, Laag 550.6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 10:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-06-05 15-55-35 Norwegen Melbu Melbu 8.0-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012-02-29 12-04-23 Greece Athina Spáta.jpg

File:2012-02-29 12-04-23 Greece Athina Spáta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

141.237.32.177 12:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Audio_files_needing_categories

Audio files needing categories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Þingvellir Iceland 020.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Þingvellir Iceland 020.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Þingvellir Iceland 020.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Estopedist1 (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Persepolis 24.11.2009 10-14-31.jpg

File:Persepolis 24.11.2009 10-14-31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rohalamin (talk) 05:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-04-19 09-34-30 Iran Ostan-e Esfahan - Chah Taqi 360 11h.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressiv Panorama, good quality --Wieggy 17:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Africa - Cape Town Drieankerbaai from Lion's head.jpg

File:South Africa - Cape Town Drieankerbaai from Lion's head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zürich airport

Hi, Simisa. You reverted my edit, because Zurich International Airport does not situate in Zürich. Looking from map, airport is really quite far from Zürich, probably you are right. But the problem is that category:2013 at Zurich International Airport belongs into category:2013 in Zürich, category:Zurich International Airport by year belongs into category:Zürich by year and category:Zurich International Airport belongs into category:Transport in Zürich. What do you think, is it all wrong? Taivo (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taivo. There are two political levels: Canton of Zurich and Zurich (city). As Zurich International Airport is not on the territory of the city of Zurich the category "2013 at Zurich International Airport" does not belong into the category "2013 in Zurich" but should rather be in the category "2013 in the canton of Zurich" and into category "Canton of Zurich by year", if these exist. Best regards, simisa Simisa (talk) 15:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dörflingen.svg

File:Dörflingen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 18:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-08-05 12-52-50 Valfurva Dosdè 2315.5-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]